CA Supreme Court Issues Ruling in Lesbian Insemination Case
Yesterday the California Supreme Court made a landmark decision regarding Lesbian Artificial Insemination and Doctor Discrimination. The court ruled that Doctors are barred from refusing medical care to gays and lesbians based on the Doctor’s religious beliefs. This is a huge decision for gay and lesbian rights and was a unanimous decision, whereas the May decision legalizing gay marriage in the state of California was a 4 to 3 decision. Hopefully, this is just the first of the court’s decisions to support gay and lesbian rights when it comes to bearing children. What are your thoughts?
Click Here for Complete Article
Summary of case:
In the California case of North Coast Women’s Care Medical Group, Inc v. Benitez, the Supreme Court of California is set to decide whether or not a clinic, or physician, can successfully use a defense of religion when deciding not to treat a patient based on their marital status or sexual orientation. The patient, in this case, is alleging that North Coast Women’s Care Medical Group, and their physicians, refused to provide her with fertility treatments because of her sexual orientation. However, North Coast defends that their refusal of treatment was based on the free exercise of their religious ideals and their supposed right to refuse treatment on the ground of marital status.
According to California law, the rule exists that a doctor may refuse to perform certain medical procedures in accordance with their religious beliefs at large; however, they may not discriminate on a patient by patient basis in determining whether to not perform certain medical procedures while using religion as a defense.
Under California law, at the time the complaint was brought, the patient was not considered to be legally married to her partner. Yet, under the Unruh Act, it is unconstitutional to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, which now also applies to discrimination based on marital status. After almost 8 years, the case has finally reached the Supreme Court of California on the heels of the decision to legalize gay marriage in California.
As for now, the court has issued a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its order granting summary judgment on the physicians’ religion-based defense and to enter an order denying the motion for summary judgment as to the physicians. This could be a very controversial and possibly a society changing decision. The Supreme Court of California currently has 90 days to come to a decision the issue.

Poway, CA 92064 | Toll Free: 866.350.0983 | Phone: 858-748-4133 | FAX:
858-748-4244
To compel a doctor to perform an elective procedure which is against their religious beliefs is just wrong. The doctors were not withholding “care” for the physical welfare of the patient. They were following their conscience, and following a biblical principal. This is a wrong headed decision from the Court. A proper solution would be for the clinic to have referral options for patients that were outside of their moral scope. What’s next, doctors being forced to perform abortions on demand?
Comment by John — August 23, 2008 @ 2:06 am