<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CA Supreme Court Issues Ruling in Lesbian Insemination Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.surrogacyissuesblog.com/2008/08/19/ca-supreme-court-issues-ruling-in-lesbian-insemination-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.surrogacyissuesblog.com/2008/08/19/ca-supreme-court-issues-ruling-in-lesbian-insemination-case/</link>
	<description>Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  7 Mar 2010 00:56:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.surrogacyissuesblog.com/2008/08/19/ca-supreme-court-issues-ruling-in-lesbian-insemination-case/comment-page-1/#comment-208769</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surrogacyissuesblog.com/2008/08/19/ca-supreme-court-issues-ruling-in-lesbian-insemination-case/#comment-208769</guid>
		<description>To compel a doctor to perform an elective procedure which is against their religious beliefs is just wrong. The doctors were not withholding &quot;care&quot; for the physical welfare of the patient. They were following their conscience, and following a biblical principal. This is a wrong headed decision from the Court. A proper solution would be for the clinic to have referral options for patients that were outside of their moral scope. What&#039;s next, doctors being forced to perform abortions on demand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To compel a doctor to perform an elective procedure which is against their religious beliefs is just wrong. The doctors were not withholding &#8220;care&#8221; for the physical welfare of the patient. They were following their conscience, and following a biblical principal. This is a wrong headed decision from the Court. A proper solution would be for the clinic to have referral options for patients that were outside of their moral scope. What&#8217;s next, doctors being forced to perform abortions on demand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
