Comments on: Botched IVF Procedure at Clinic Finally Settles & Yet Another is Filed http://www.surrogacyissuesblog.com/2009/09/15/botched-ivf-procedure-at-clinic-finally-settles-yet-another-is-filed/ Blog Sun, 7 Mar 2010 00:56:52 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1 hourly 1 By: Theresa M. Erickson http://www.surrogacyissuesblog.com/2009/09/15/botched-ivf-procedure-at-clinic-finally-settles-yet-another-is-filed/comment-page-1/#comment-353386 Theresa M. Erickson Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:59:42 +0000 http://www.surrogacyissuesblog.com/?p=470#comment-353386 Thank you for the update and information. I usually have limited information, and this is important. Please keep our readers updated. Thank you for the update and information. I usually have limited information, and this is important. Please keep our readers updated.

]]> By: louisebyer@earthlink.net http://www.surrogacyissuesblog.com/2009/09/15/botched-ivf-procedure-at-clinic-finally-settles-yet-another-is-filed/comment-page-1/#comment-353380 louisebyer@earthlink.net Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:10:48 +0000 http://www.surrogacyissuesblog.com/?p=470#comment-353380 Thanks for picking this up, but in fact, the case that was filed yesterday is a new case and does not have to do with the prior $1 million settlement. That case has been settled for some time now and involved the same clinic when it was owned by a different party. The new case involves the fertilization of the plaintiff's eggs with the sperm of a stranger, not her husband and the destruction of those embryos without the couple's consent. This is a different couple entirely. For a detailed understanding of this case, please visit www.hershlaw.com thanks very much for your interest in this important area of the law louise rosen byer Thanks for picking this up, but in fact, the case that was filed yesterday is a new case and does not have to do with the prior $1 million settlement. That case has been settled for some time now and involved the same clinic when it was owned by a different party.

The new case involves the fertilization of the plaintiff’s eggs with the sperm of a stranger, not her husband and the destruction of those embryos without the couple’s consent. This is a different couple entirely.

For a detailed understanding of this case, please visit http://www.hershlaw.com

thanks very much for your interest in this important area of the law

louise rosen byer

]]>