There was an interesting article in the Washington Times on Friday, whereby the physician quoted blames the profit motive behind sperm donation (and the resulting passage of inheritable diseases) for the damage that has been done to these families.  He believes that the recently reported case of the sperm donor who helped create 24 children, nine of whom became sick with an inherited heart condition, is a cry (scream) for reform. 

While I do agree with about 50% of his arguments, we must remember that reform will be good if it allows people (couples and individuals) to make their own choices when it comes to reproductive freedom. 

Another point to make is that even with blood and other tissues, there is some profit even in a non-profit organization – salaries are paid, as are bonuses – just look at the American Red Cross. 

Secondly, I do believe that their should be some additional controls and guidance over gamete donors, as well as a way to track how many donations are occurring and the number of resulting births.  This is also where follow ups are needed – if there is a profit being made, the least that can be done is some form of tracking.  Genetic counseling is also admirable, but again it is based on the donor’s knowledge of their own history, as well as their family’s history. 

Finally, although I do not agree with the complete loss of anonymity, I do think that an open identity option is preferable.  In fact, out of 100 egg donors, I see only one out of the 100 that is not open to being contacted for medical reasons and when and if the child would like to meet them in the future.  I think that this is an honorable compromise that will make the parties work together, as well as protect the child in the future.  What are your thoughts?

Trackback this Post | Feed on comments to this Post